Author Archives: robert

Fear of Public Speaking

Who I am

As the team lead of the Part-Time Scientists I naturally have to give a lot of presentations and talks. We are one of 26 teams participating in the Google Lunar X PRIZE, a race to send a rover to the moon, which must be achieved with at least 90 percent private (non-government) funding. That means we have to present and advertize our idea to many people, for small groups of people or at large events with over 1400 attendees. At first it was not easy for me to speak in front of a large audience or just give any presentation, but I stuck with it, learned a few things about it and feel much more confident now.

The beginnings

I started public speaking by taking a big plunge. My first serious presentation was before 1400 attendees at the 26th Chaos Communication Congress (26C3) in Berlin, Germany, one of the biggest and most important hacker conventions worldwide. My second presentation was shortly afterward at O’Reilly Media for a markedly smaller and markedly different audience. That was a large difference, and it highlights one of the important public speaking strategies: know your audience. It is important to consider who will be sitting in front of you and listen to you, so you can adjust your presentation accordingly. You structure a presentation very differently when you are preparing it for a group of engineers, a general audience, or a group of potential investors or sponsors whom you have to thrill and sell your idea to.

It is also important to know what kind of talk one is preparing for. There is a huge difference between an Ignitetalk, which takes at most 10 minutes, and a 90-minute presentation. For an Ignitetalk, your aim is going to be to get people excited about a problem, and then show you are the only one(s) who can solve it. For longer presentations you want to get more detailed information across.

In the beginning I relied heavily on the book “slide:ology” It helped me prepare for my first few presentations. I read the whole book several times before my first big presentation, and picked a few ideas and concepts to put into practice.

Before the speech

Important strategies for a good speech can be separated into the preparation and the presentation itself. A good preparation is essential for a good presentation.

Idea and structure of a presentation

You start with a topic, whether chosen or assigned, and think about what you are trying to say about it. Then you collect everything you can find about the topic. I always start with a new share in Dropbox to collect images, photos, graphics, ideas, sketches, screenshots and data that I have available. Then I note how long the talk is scheduled for, and adjust the time for the actual speech and presentation. If the talk is scheduled, for example, for 60 minutes, I plan for a 40 minute presentation. It takes five minutes to get up on stage, back off stage, and do the introductions and greetings. Another 15 minutes are reserved for questions and answers at the end. Mind those 15 minutes, because they are important.

When you are making the slide presentation itself, there are a few points to consider. One of the most important slides is the very first one, because it will be projected on the screen even before your talk starts. Therefore it is important to show some graphics and not too much text. The graphic should indicate the theme of the talk, without getting too technical.

I don’t just use graphics in the beginning, but most of my presentations are images with little text; at most one or two bullet points. My goal is to hook the audience on a particular medium. That is voice of the presenter, and not the pixels that are projected onto the screen. The image just announces a new theme or topic and then lets the audience focus their attention again on me, the presenter.

Another consideration is whether a purely slideshow presentation is the best option, especially when one can derive a solution for the audience or demonstrate a chain of thought on a whiteboard, one should seize this opportunity.

Leitmotif

It is important to memorize the leitmotif or central story of your talk. You have to know its structure and the logical order. When you’re up on stage giving your talk and moving to the next slide, you should know what’s on it without looking at it. This also prevents that nagging feeling at the end of the talk of having forgotten something important, or that one suddenly thinks of a hundred other things one would have wanted to say.

Practice

That is why practicing is important. However, one should be cautious not to overdo it. Too much practice can create too much of a routine, which will make the presentation less lively and more monotonous and plain. Another benefit of practice is that when you are nervous, you like to fall back on what you do best, and when you haven’t practiced then there is nothing to fall back on and the stuttering starts. For long talks, I usually practice the entire talk 3-5 times. For shorter talks, like the Ignite Talks, I often practice 30-40 times, and usually with a camera. So it turns out I spend about as much time preparing for short talk as for long ones.

Copy&Paste

You should pay attention how others make their presentation. I find especially interesting how people use notes. Some have lots of little papers that they flip over every half minutes. Others have no notes and wave their hand wildly about. Neither is good. You can have a few notes to refer to here and there, and you can illustrate concepts with your hands, but one should not attempt to circulate all the air in the room just with one’s hands. That looks rather silly.

Know your tools

If you are using tools and gadgets, you should spend considerable time before the presentation to become thoroughly familiar with them. It makes a bad impression to be repeatedly looking for the laser pointer button during the presentation, esp. when one has already messed up the presentation by pressing the wrong buttons. My gadget of choice is the Logitech R800 Professional Presenter. It can go forward and back in the presentation, fade the presentation out to white or black, and the green laser pointer works well even on LCD screens. One can also set a vibration alarm for different periods to get subtle reminder of how much time has passed or is left, so you can move on to the next point or know when there are only 5 minutes left.

It is also important to have your own gear with you. Many events have their own presentation computer and pointer tool, but you are really familiar only with your own gear.

During the speech

Feedback

In order to get some feedback on how the audience is perceiving the talk, I try to pick out one or two people who seem particularly interested in the beginning, and use them to gauge how well your talk is proceeding. It makes no sense to worry about the people that are about to nod off at the start, one should try to keep the people that are willing to pay attention engaged. This works better with 1000 attendees than with 40, because it is less obvious who you have picked out. Under any circumstances, do not just look at your laptop or notes. That won’t engage anybody.

Stage fright

Stage fright is good. Nobody believes me, but in my opinion stage fright is useful, as long as it is the right kind. There are two kinds of stage fright. One just blocks all thoughts and creates the dreaded blackouts. The other gets me into top form, sky rockets my adrenalin level and brings me to maximum concentration. It helps me focus completely on my talk.

Flawlessness

If something doesn’t work right during a speech, or there is small glitch, it’s no big matter. Be relaxed about it and try to turn it into a joke, because you can’t undo it. A speech with a little mishap is often more memorable than one that went off without a hitch. When something is completely perfect and flawless, there seems to be something missing.

The last am standing

A lot of presenters get worried when people leave the room, but you shouldn’t let that distract you. In all likelihood somebody needs to go to the restroom or is taking a very important phone call. Of course, there will also be people who leave because they are not interested in the talk. That’s normal and just as well. One cannot be all things to all people. If you end up with just five people in your talk, at least there were five people that stayed until the end and paid attention. I’d rather have five engaged and enthusiastic listeners than 100 people who won’t remember anything I told them. Most people choose to attend a talk, and it is their right to choose to leave.

Questions and Answers

The Q&A session at the end of a talk is very important. Many people’s mind aren’t made up about a talk until one has taken a few questions and given some answers or there has been some discussion with the presenter. You shouldn’t be worried if you can’t answer all questions, because you can’t have all the answers, and not all questions can be answered in a minute or two after the talk. Clearly you have to know your area, but if there is a question you cannot answer, it is best to just admit that and move on instead of hemming and hawing and wasting time. People can tell when you’re not sure of your answer, and it’s big to admit your lack of knowledge.

You also should think that many questions indicate that your talk wasn’t comprehensive or detailed enough and that you need to rework it. You can’t cover everything in one talk, and there will always be some questions at the end. That’s the purpose of the Q&A session and why it is so important.

Talks given

  • ESW Conference, technical audience, ~30 people, 15m Q&A

  • GLXP Presenation, see above

  • 26C3, technical audience, 1400 people + live Internet streaming, 1h Q&A

  • O’Reilly Ignite Talk, ~100-150 people, 15m speech, 1-2h casual Q&A

  • CeBIT Talk, ~50-100, trade show attendees, no Q&A

  • LinuxTag, ~100 conference attendees

  • 27C3, technical audience, 1400 people + live Internet streaming, 15m Q&A

  • LinuxTag, ~100 conference attendees, 15m Q&A

  • Chaos Communication Camp, ~100 people, 15m Q&A

Leave a comment

Team Part-Time Scientists to attract audiences to … Attraktor!

On September 1, two of our Hamburg-based team members are going to give a presentation at Hamburg’s Attraktor. The aim of this registered society is to bring together people who wanna share their ideas, projects, visions and experience. Be it hackers, coders, sceners, admins, sysops, networkers, cryptologists, mathematicians, electronics technicians, radio operators, model railroaders or lock pickers – everyone is welcome to gather and mingle!

As for the presentation, topics will include an overview of what the Google Lunar X-Prize is all about, details of the mission, status quo of the rover’s development, FPGA development, lander concepts as well as details on our side project ComRay.

In addition, attendees will be witnessing a “world premiere”: for the first time ever, moon rover Asimov Jr. will be operated in front of a live audience!

If you’re located in Hamburg or the surrounding areas, you have no excuse to miss out!

For further details on time and venue, please visit the Attraktor’s homepage (available in German only):
http://www.attraktor.org/

We look forward to seeing as many of you as possible!

1 Comment

One small footstep …

wheel stressed

OK, we know a lot about footsteps on the moon, but how much do we know about wheel tracks on the moon?

We were facing the exact same problem when we first started working on our rover prototype “Asimov Jr.” Designing the wheels of a lunar rover may seem like quite an easy and intuitive thing to do: they’re supposed to be round, as light as possible and they gotta have good traction. Well, things actually weren’t  t h a t  easy …

Let’s start the game by piling up some sheets of paper and call them “mission statement”. Sounds boring? It certainly is. But without such a statement you’re most probably going to sift through various wheel designs for, like, two years, without ever getting to a result.
What’s important is to figure out the conditions of where your wheels are supposed to operate. The rules of the Google Lunar X-Prize state that you have to rove at least 500 meters over the lunar surface and, ideally, survive a lunar night. Key facts for us are: we aim for a landing on a lunar day, which means it’s going to be real hot with temperatures of up to 125 degrees C (that’s 257 degrees F for you imperials and 398.15 degrees K for you trekkies). Second, we plan on landing close to the equator, for compared to the poles the equator is as smooth as a freshly built parking lot and far easier to overcome than the cluttered landscape of the lunar poles. If Asimov Jr. is to survive a lunar night, the wheels need to withstand extreme temperature shifts in the range of +125 to -125 degrees Celsius(-193 degrees F and 148.15 degrees K).

Asimov Jr. Wheel prototypes based on plastic

Now, let’s discuss our options a little bit. Air-filled rubber wheels are probably best known, but their fate on the moon – and on space flights – is pretty much doomed. Due to the vacuum, the wheels would explode and burst into pieces. Even without the exploding part, the rubber would soon “vaporize into thin vacuum” due to its outgassing properties. “Outgassing” basically means that all materials contain a certain amount of air, and in space this enclosed air will do anything to break free, destroying the rubber in the process. The amount of enclosed air particles and their behavior defines the material’s distinct outgassing properties.
What about non-air filled rubber wheels then? They perform somewhat better when it comes to outgassing and, of course, they wouldn’t explode, but the extreme temperature shifts would pose a big problem. It’s like pulling a piece of rubber out of the freezer and putting it right into a pre-heated oven: the result isn’t gonna make up a wheel anymore.
Now, let’s skip materials like wood, plastic, steel or iron, and let’s take a look at aluminum.
Aluminum is light as a feather, plus, it is robust and tolerant towards temperature extremes … congratulations! You found yourself a suitable material!

collecting lunar soil

OK, so we handled the temperature. The only thing left is the roving around the lunar equator. The lunar equator is quite a special place in our solar system; the complete lack of an atmosphere means there’s a complete lack of wind, too. The best word to describe the lunar surface is probably: debris. After 4.6 billion years of constant galactic bombardment, the lunar surface is covered in layers of dust which are between 5 to 10 meters – or 16 to 32 feet – thick. Since there are no currents and winds, moon dust has different properties than ordinary earth sand. While a footstep on the beach is gone within minutes, the bootprint of Neil Armstrong was kind of made for eternity. This is due to the characteristics of the particles. Sand grains are round and electrically neutral. You put some on your hand and they will rain down through your fingers. Regolith grains are more like spikes meshed together and they’re electrically charged. You put some on your hand and you just won’t get rid of them easily. But what does this mean for our wheels?
Travelling on wheels is always about good surface traction. The goal is to design the wheel pattern in a way that the wheels have the least weight and the best traction. And in this environment: don’t get clogged up by regolith.
There is no distinct answer on how to find the perfect wheel pattern. The only thing for sure is that using the wrong wheel pattern can leave your rover digging itself deep into the regolith without moving an inch.

wheel stressed

We did a lot of regolith and traction surface simulations using SolidWorks and ended up with almost 50 suitable designs. We picked out the most appropriate one from an engineer’s point of view and had the wheels for our prototypes manufactured accordingly. Towards the end of the year, we will be conducting extensive tests with synthetic regolith in different testing facilities. Among the best-known experts in the field are the folks over at the California Space Authority. They have a large and realistic testing site designed for the Lunar Excavation Challenge. If you’re interested in synthetic regolith and cool video footage, just visit this site: (link), or drop them (link to matts official page) an email.

Umm … I got a stupid question!
I mean, if the environment is so complicated … why doesn’t everyone use the exact same wheels?

Well, as with every problem, there are always multiple solutions.

For example, let’s take a closer look at the wheels of the LRV – the Lunar Roving Vehicle, or simply: the Apollo rover.
Apollo 15 - Lunar Rover 2
As you can see, its wheels look as if they were made of rubber, but in fact, they do not contain any plastic at all. They consist of a composite mix of materials, starting with a basic frame of iron and ending up with a mesh of woven piano strings to provide the needed traction. They behave like normal rubber wheels but have the distinct advantage of being more lightweight than filled wheels. As the landing module had already reached its weight limit, those wheels were deemed the best option. Mixing multiple materials to composite materials can lead to a much stronger structure. However, most composite materials need time, intensive development and testing to survive severe temperature shifts.
So, why has it worked for them?
As the Apollo missions only took play during the period of a lunar day, the wheels didn’t have to survive a lunar night. It is most likely that by now the the wheels of the LRV would have dismantled completely.

Lunokhod detail

In other missions with longer lifetimes, NASA/JPL and Russia tried out different wheel designs based on groups of meshes supplying the needed traction. The main reasons for this design change were again weight savings. Cut down costs and spare weight for scientific instruments, while reaching for an extended mission lifetime. The only drawback is that their wheels behave pretty much like tracked wheels, meaning they got a lot of junctions and thus single points-of-failures. All these potential points-of-failures need to be checked and certified to withstand the stress of launch and descent.

dsc_0150k

As for our wheels and their design, you can we keep up on that by following us on Facebook, Twitter or by reading our blog. The first test results and footage will be available for you by the end of August!

To learn more about wheels on the moon take a look at the following sites:

Science – HowStuffWorks.com

Wikipedia – Apollo Lunar Rover

Wikipedia – Lunokhod Rover

1 Comment

PTS at LinuxTag2010

PTS@LinuxTag2010

Almost one year ago, coinciding withLinuxTag 2009, we officially became competitors in the GLXP. This year’s LinuxTag is coming up soon, and we decided to descend on the Internationales Congress Centrum Berlin after last years visit again.


This time, though, there will be a presentation by our very own embedded development and communications expert: Arne Reiners.


FPGA Development

At the core of the presentation are FPGAs, field-programmable gate arrays. What these “re-programmable chips”, in more general terms, can do, how they can withstand the harsh lunar environment and why they’re the future of space hardware will be explained in detail by Arne. He’s hoping for lots of questions, so please bring your thinking caps!


When and where?

LinuxTag 2010, Friday, June 11, 5:30 pm – 6:00 pm


or on YouTube shortly after!

We hope to see you there!

Posted on by robert | 1 Comment

Forget the iPad — it’s Asimov Jr. R2 at the International Aerospace Exhibition in Berlin!

PTS@ILA2010

Germany's first GLXP team is gonna rock Germany's top aviation and aerospace trade show:
from June 8 to 13, members of the Team Part-Time Scientists will be present at this year's Internationale Luft- und Raumfahrtausstellung!

Find us in Hall 9, booth 305a, where PTS engineers and team leader Robert Boehme are going to reveal the new lunar rover prototype Asimov Jr. R2.

    Complete with new and improved features such as:

  • a solar panel that can be directed at various angles towards the sun or earth
  • a phased array antenna for Earth-Moon communication
  • redesigned wheel suspension
  • and some more!

Oh, and if you need a rest after all the marvelling and talking at our booth ...

… here's a teaser of other things ILA has in store for visitors:

Youtube

We hope to see you there!

Posted on by robert | 1 Comment

The local

Posted on by robert | Comments Off